Navigation

Search

Categories

On this page

Archive

Blogroll

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in any way.

RSS 2.0 | Atom 1.0 | CDF

Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

Total Posts: 20
This Year: 1
This Month: 0
This Week: 0
Comments: 10

Sign In

# Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:00:51 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00) ( Grammar Articles )
English grammar is chock full of rules and more often than not many of us tend to get overly enthusiastic with descriptions. When this occurs, grammar check programs will not always pick these out and what remains is English grammar redundancy.

Chances are you won’t have to read far into a newspaper story or magazine article to discover grammar check is not foolproof. Recent examples I discovered in mainstream media include: "adequate enough," "coupled together with," and "an army soldier."

Sometimes explanatory constructions are required in certain contexts. One can make reference to a Mafia soldier; but if the context is the news story about a war, the reader understands the meaning of "solider" without adding on "army."

Besides sounding silly, proper English grammar is lacking because the meaning is replicated and it weakens the expressiveness of the language. Conducting a manual grammar check to ensure the use of proper English grammar is essential.

Other common redundant combinations that have appeared in mainstream news recently include:
  • Progress forward
  • Forest of trees
  • Evacuated out
  • Speeding too fast
  • Charred black
  • Cold refrigerator
  • Socialize together
  • Two twin towers

    Bookmark and Share
All comments require the approval of the site owner before being displayed.
OpenID
Please login with either your OpenID above, or your details below.
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (Some html is allowed: a@href@title, b, blockquote@cite, em, i, strike, strong, sub, sup, u) where the @ means "attribute." For example, you can use <a href="" title=""> or <blockquote cite="Scott">.  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):

Live Comment Preview